Home arrow Opinion arrow John Bentley Mays arrow Follow Christ's sacrificial example
spacer
Murphy Book Banner

spacer
spacer

spacer
spacer spacer
spacer
Webcatholicregister
Comments

Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Murphy Book Button


 
Follow Christ's sacrificial example
Friday, 08 February 2008
 

Written by John Bentley Mays,

Views : 1266    



I have a friend, a fellow writer, whom I’m here calling Peter. That’s not his real name, but I can assure you he’s real.

Peter is a man with remarkable gifts, both intellectual and artistic. He is also a man possessed by a rare and powerful hunger for God. But like other passionate souls committed to disbelief, he has many principled reasons for rejecting God’s mercy and love. They include philosophical objections grounded in deep familiarity with modern critical thought, and disagreements with this or that teaching of Christianity. But his key contention with God is not the idea of God, but the realities of history.

Here’s an example of what I’m talking about. While living in Paris a few years ago, Peter found himself one afternoon in Notre Dame Cathedral. A Mass was under way. His description of the event recalled Masses I had attended in that great church, with their jubilant atmosphere and magnificent music, beautifully executed liturgy and (in the days when I went) the energetic preaching of Cardinal Lustiger, then archbishop of Paris.

For Peter, however, the Mass that day was more than a wonderful public ceremony of the kind Catholics know (or knew) how to do very well. It was a sudden, unexpected glimpse of the divine glory that had been calling him for years, a breathtaking experience of the warmth that radiates from the furnace of love forever blazing in the heart of the Catholic Church. He was thrilled by what he saw— so exhilarated, in fact, that he could not sleep the following night.

But the next morning, his joy drained away, and was replaced by doubts. While Peter did not question that the beauty he had witnessed at Notre Dame was vividly real, old facts resurfaced from memory, palling his mind with discouragement. How, he wondered, could so splendid a church — if, indeed, it was splendid — have sponsored the Inquisition or the trial of Galileo? How could nominally Christian nations, such as Germany and Romania and Poland, have willingly colluded with the Nazis in their attempted destruction of the Jewish people?

Convinced that no church capable of doing such deeds could be the site of mercy and truth, Peter concluded that what he had seen at Notre Dame was a kind of mirage, a fantasy produced by his profound desire. Delight fled, sad disbelief returned — a disbelief that persists to this day.

Catholic apologists, of course, have arguments — convincing ones, in my view — to explain the co-existence of good and evil in the Christian church. I don’t need to rehearse them now. But don’t all the intelligent arguments of our theologians seem like glib rationalizations when confronted by the historical facts that overwhelmed Peter in Paris? Be that as it may, it’s hard to believe that fresh propositions about Christian truth are what is needed by the Peters of this world, and by the countless other people dismayed by the discrepancy between what Christians say and what we do.

What’s surely needed, instead, are new and wonderful facts that are as impossible to ignore or argue away as the old, dire ones history gives us. I am speaking here of lives lived according to Christ’s sacrificial example, men and women who embody the love of Jesus and who express it in the real-world circumstances of daily existence. Such people — the people Lent calls all of us to become — offer the only genuinely decisive, persuasive proof that God has acted in history and that the reign of Christ has begun in the contemporary city and world.

In his message for Lent (accessible at the web site of the Holy See, www.vatican.va), Pope Benedict urges us to become living proof of the Gospel in a very practical way: by becoming poorer for the sake of the world. Almsgiving, he writes, “represents a specific way to assist those in need and, at the same time, an exercise in self-denial to free us from attachment to worldly goods.” He cites a question asked long ago by St. John, but directly relevant to those of us who live in the world’s affluent societies: “How does God’s love abide in anyone who has the world’s goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses to help?”

The answer, of course, is that it doesn’t. We should take to heart St. John’s “ringing rebuke” — as the Holy Father calls it — during Lent and throughout the year, and thereby let God transform us into instruments of grace in the unbelieving world.

And pray for Peter— that he may see in the Christians he knows the indisputable evidence of the new life he longs for.

Recommend this article...


John Bentley Mays
About the author:
John Bentley Mays is a Toronto author and journalist. His award-winning journalism has appeared in the Globe and Mail , National Post and Walrus magazine.



Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Related articles

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

   (0 vote)

 

Display 3 of 3 comments

1. 08-03-2008 10:55

Hate lierarure or defamation?
I fully support the above comments. These allegations re the Polish people, are cowardly, insidious and unbecoming of your newspaper that "offers its readers dependable information and opinions as a joyful servant of God's pilgrim church." So, who is to be held accountable for this hate literature/ defamation? Is it the person allegedly making the accusation? The author, who's supposedly quoting someone else (hearsay)? The Editor, who decided to print this out of ignorance, lack of sensitivity, or merely incompetence? See: http:// www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ jsource/Holocaust/ righteous1.html
Registered
rickpro

2. 21-02-2008 21:49

Catholic Register Commits LIBEL
John Bentley Mays's charge that Poland "willingly colluded with the Nazis in their attempted destruction of the Jewish people" (Feb. 17) is not only baseless it also abhorrent.  
 
Rather than my explaining why, allow me to quote no less an authority that Yisrael Gutman, the director of historical research at the Yad Vashem Institute in Jerusalem and author of numerous studies, who has been unequivocal in lambasting such remarks.  
 
"I should like to make two things clear here. First, all accusations against the Poles that they were responsible for what is referred to as the ‘Final Solution’ are not even worth mentioning. Secondly, there is no validity at all in the contention that … Polish attitudes were the reason for the siting of the death camps in Poland. Poland was a completely occupied country. There was a difference in the kind of ‘occupation’ countries underwent in Europe. Each country experienced a different occupation and almost all had a certain amount of autonomy, limited and defined in various ways. This autonomy did not exist in Poland. No one asked the Poles how one should treat the Jews."  
 
"I want to be unequivocal about this. When it is said that Poles supposedly took part in the extermination of the Jews on the side of the Germans, that is not true. It has no foundation in fact. There was no such thing as Poles taking part in the extermination of the Jewish population."  
 
Poles -- more than 6,000 of them and growing -- form the largest group by far of any nation recognized by Yad Vashem as Righteous Gentiles. Poland was the only country in Europe where the Germans routinely imposed the death penalty for any form of assistance to Jews. More than 1,000 Poles -- men, women, and children -- were put to death for helping Jews.  
 
Unlike other occupied countries, the Poles were also targeted for genocidal policies targeting their "elites" including the Catholic clergy and their vibrant underground. In addition to three million Polish Jews, three million Christian Poles were also murdered by the German invaders.
Registered
Hanna Sokolski

3. 18-02-2008 20:35

Poland willingly collaborated?
As co-author of a book about Poland in World War II (A Question of Honor, Knopf, 2003), I take strong exception to Mays's view that Poland, along with Germany and Romania, "willingly colluded with the Nazis in their attempted destruction of the Jewish people." He's right, of course, about Germany and Romania -- and could have added other countries, e.g. France and Norway, where pro-Nazi or Nazi regimes existed. But Poland, despite some individual acts of collaboration, was the ONLY nation invaded & defeated by Germany that NEVER had a collaborationist government & NEVER surrendered!
Registered
stanc

Display 3 of 3 comments

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.8 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >
 
Sharelife button
 Mount Carmel Spiritual Centre
Help Iraqi Christians
Redemptorist
Scarboro Missions
Covenant House button
Atlantic School of Theology
Mavrix

RSS Feed

 RSS
The following links have RSS Feeds to which you are welcome to subscribe

News

Opinion

Faith

Education

Arts

Youth

Donate today!

Support the
Canadian Catholic Press

Year of St. Paul
spacer
Catholic Press AssociationAssociation of Roman Catholic Communicators of CanadaMySqlCanadian Church Press
spacer
 


© 2008 The Catholic Register
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
 
/>
  >