A recent report from the Quebec government showed 262 euthanasia deaths in the first seven months after the province legalized the practice, which is three times higher than expected. Photo courtesy of Morgan via Flickr [https://flic.kr/p/8kRpJM]

Quebec euthanasia triple predictions amid abuse worries

By 
  • November 8, 2016

OTTAWA – With euthanasia occurring in Quebec at triple government predictions, obtaining accurate statistics on medically assisted deaths across Canada is almost impossible and could lead to abuse, according to anti-euthanasia advocates.

A recent report from the Quebec government showed 262 euthanasia deaths in the first seven months after the province legalized the practice last December. Health Minister Gaétan Barrette told journalists he was surprised at the figure, which is about three times higher than anticipated.

He said the number of euthanasia deaths in Quebec could reach 300 by the end of the year, but the executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition believes the figure will be closer to 450.

Alex Schadenberg said even in Quebec, where the requirements for reporting and oversight are the most rigorous, euthanasia deaths are likely being under-reported. He also expressed frustration at a lack of transparency in other provinces, making it impossible to compile accurate statistics on assisted suicide and euthanasia, and leaving no way of identifying instances of abuse.

“A system was promised, but we don’t know what it is,” Schadenberg said.

Quebec’s law resembles those of Belgium and the Netherlands, which rely on doctors to self-report instances of euthanasia, Schadenberg said. “The doctor does the death,” but we will have no way of knowing if he or she reports all of them, especially those that fail to meet the government’s criteria, he said.

Across the rest of Canada, there is no co-ordinated system to compile information on euthanasia and assisted suicide, Schadenberg said. The federal law passed in June that legalized assisted suicide requires the government to establish reporting guidelines to record requests and approvals for assisted suicide, but those guidelines remain unwritten.

As of mid-October, in addition to the euthanasia cases in Quebec, there had been about 200 known cases of assisted suicide in other provinces, according to various media reports.

But Schadenberg said some smaller hospitals are not releasing any data for privacy reasons. He predicts statistics could become as difficult to come by as abortion statistics are in Ontario as hospitals invoke privacy concerns.

In Quebec, the government report included three cases of euthanasia that did not comply with the law but there is no information on what if anything will happen in those cases, said Aubert Martin, executive director of the province’s grassroots anti-euthanasia organization Living with Dignity.

“We’re talking about killing a human being,” Martin said. “This is criminal. Is there going to be any follow-up?”

Schadenberg said the Quebec government will not divulge the circumstances of those three euthanasia deaths. One patient was not terminally ill as required. There is no sign “they are even slapping the wrist of the doctor involved,” he said.

Martin was not surprised at the high number of euthanasia requests in Quebec. A report after six months had already shown the numbers were “exceeding predictions by two or three times,” he said.

Despite its surprise at the high numbers, the Quebec government is considering proposals to soften safeguards, such as no longer requiring approval of a second doctor for each euthanasia request, Martin said.

Martin estimates only 10 to 12 doctors have been involved in Quebec’s reported 262 deaths. In Quebec City, where most of the deaths have occurred, “there are only two of them doing the job,” Martin said. “They’re the two complaining (about the requirement for a second doctor).”

The government claims there is a “consensus” regarding euthanasia, but it contradicts this by claiming it’s hard to find a second doctor to okay it, Martin said.

“Every precautionary measure sold as a way to pass the law is now seen as an obstacle. So if we follow that logic, it’s easy to predict in the next years what we call the slippery slope will be felt as wanted progress.”

Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.

DONATE