University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson tells religious groups to "tremble" at transgender politics. Photo courtesy of Jordan Peterson via Facebook

Churches should ‘tremble’ at transgender agenda, professor says

  • November 23, 2016

OTTAWA – A University of Toronto professor at the centre of a transgender storm issued a stark warning for religious groups that are out of step with society’s politically correct agenda.

“Tremble,” said Jordan Peterson.

In response to a question regarding the implications of transgender politics for religious freedom, the professor described the “social-justice warriors” driving this agenda as “postmodern Marxists.”

“Those people are no friends to religion, that’s for sure,” said Peterson, a political psychologist who has studied the psychology of totalitarianism for 30 years.

“As long as your religion doesn’t contravene any of the social-justice warrior doctrines, and by the way it does, then you’ll be okay as long as you’re quiet — and I would say very quiet... You guys have every serious reason to be worried.”

Peterson, the centre of controversy over his refusal to use transgender pronouns, was in Ottawa Nov. 19 to receive an award the day after Transgender Bill C-16 was sent to the Senate. The bill, which passed easily through the House of Commons, adds gender identity and expression to the Canadian Human Rights Act and to the Criminal Code’s hate-speech provisions. There was no recorded vote because too few opposition members stood to require one.

An attempt by Conservative MP Cathay Wagantall to have the bill returned to committee for further review failed. Critical of what she calls the “deeply flawed, undemocratic process” that saw the bill zip through the Justice Committee without hearing any witnesses other than the Justice Minister, Wagantall wanted each clause examined for its impact on freedom of expression.

“My concern is that dissent of any kind will be construed as hate speech and could subsequently lead to Human Rights Tribunal hearings or, worse yet, criminal charges being laid,” Wagantall said.

Peterson has expressed similar concerns. The professor has been facing recriminations after publicly assailing the use of transgender pronouns that he says are required by the Ontario Human Rights Act.

These pronouns will soon be required by the Canadian Human Rights Act as Bill C-16 speeds through Parliament, he warned. He contends that forcing people to speak against their conscience and beliefs is a hallmark of totalitarianism. Requiring people to use specific words is even more worrisome than preventing free speech, he says.

Peterson is not conventionally religious, but has studied the importance of foundational myths in providing order out of chaos for society. He believes in the Logos, a philosophical and theological system that predates Judaism. In Christianity, Logos designates the Word of God made flesh—the symbolic ideal man.

“The Word made flesh is a fundamental principle of Western culture,” Peterson said. “It will not survive without it.”

Peterson said society would be “unmoored and oscillating” from the radical right to the radical left with “nothing to keep people centred” if it lost its fundamental belief systems.

“When a society loses its religious suppositions, people turn to ideology,” he said. Ideology is a “poor” and “dangerous substitute” for religion.

Wagantall wants Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to give Canadians a clear answer on how Bill C-16 will impact immigrant and faith groups “who may be at odds with gender fluidity concepts.”

“Would they have the freedom to teach their children and practise their beliefs without being accused of hate speech or being accused of human rights violations? Yes or no?” she asked.

In addition to its new legislation, the government has appointed MP Randy Boissonnault as Special Advisor on LGBTQ2 issues to guide its aggressive agenda. He will advise Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and work with LGBTQ2 organizations, according to a government news release.

Also on Nov. 15, the Justice Minister introduced an amendment to the Criminal Code that would lower the age of consent for anal sex from 18 to 16.

Comments (1)

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I know what I personally believe is reasonable. I WILL NOT proclaim my beliefs. I will live them. All have a name. Where pronouns are possible, the name can be used instead. Silence does work. On the other hand, inundating the HRC to...

I know what I personally believe is reasonable. I WILL NOT proclaim my beliefs. I will live them. All have a name. Where pronouns are possible, the name can be used instead. Silence does work. On the other hand, inundating the HRC to paralysis won't help them either.

Read More
Peter Wloch
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Support The Catholic Register

Unlike many other news websites, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our site. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.