LifeSite agrees with approval process for D&P funds
Written by Catholic Register Staff
TORONTO - An extra bureaucratic step in approving funding for Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace partners is a wise solution to the controversy over who gets its money, said John Henry Westen.
"This was done in a way that was incredibly wise — a way to go forward," said Westen, LifeSiteNews.com founding editor. "This is a way of going forward that involves working together with the bishops in other countries."
Westen doesn't believe another level of approvals will be burdensome.
"The current arrangement, where groups can receive funding when they are opposed by their local bishop and do themselves oppose the local bishops' conference on various measures — like the right to life and/or contraception — that to me is more unwieldy than anything else," he said.
Westen said he has been encouraged by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops' response to a LifeSite offer to make a presentation to bishops reprising its allegations concerning D&P funds going to organizations that advocate for legal abortion and contraception.
"We've been trying from the beginning to be in dialogue with the bishops of Canada," he said.
CCCB general secretary Msgr. Mario Paquette turned down LifeSite's offer to give a 15-minute presentation to the bishops' plenary assembly in October, saying the agenda was already set. But Paquette did say the bishops' executive committee would be discussing the issue in September.
Westen wanted to be sure the bishops understood LifeSite's reports and the reasons for launching its investigation.
"Most of the bishops have not probably read the things we have pointed out," he said.
In publishing, just as D&P's annual fundraising campaign began, reports that five of the organization's partners in Mexico endorsed an omnibus summary of human rights issues for a United Nations review which included a call for legal abortion in the first trimester nationally, LifeSite was not out to get D&P, said Westen.
"This was never done, as was suggested by many, as a way of attacking anyone," he said. "There has been a lot of vilification of LifeSiteNews, and looking at the news service as some kind of attack dog or on a particular agenda. People have said we're a right wing group with an agenda to bring down left wing groups. It's simply not the case. We're a pro-life news service."
|