July 25, 2019
In June, for the first time ever, Canadians told pollsters their number one concern is the environment. This puts Canadians on the same page with Pope Francis, who has called on everybody — Catholic, Christian, non-Christian, even atheist — to face up to the reality of human-caused climate change in his 2015 encyclical Laudato Si’.
Laudato Si’, Pope Francis’ encyclical on “care for our common home” was published in June 2015. Here are some excerpts:
Faith, hope and charity will certainly be necessary in the context of a climate emergency, but so is politics. Moral conviction without political conviction is not going to cut it on Oct. 21, when Canadians go to the polls.
So there is a Laudato Si’ political agenda. There are Catholics lobbying governments and politicians, making moral arguments for an immediate shift away from the fossil-fuel economy. But questions remain about whether politicians are listening and whether voters have faith their vote can lead to a cleaner and cooler planet.
Redemptorist Fr. Paul Hansen, former chair of Kairos and member of the Ontario assembly of bishops’ justice and peace commission, has watched a divided Catholic community tackle many social and political issues over more than a generation. He knows the skepticism Catholics bring to Catholic social teaching.
“They tell me, ‘You’re speaking poetry and I’m living prose,’ ” Hansen said.
The short-term, cost-benefit mindset of modern capitalism so dominates our culture that we can no longer think morally or religiously, said Hansen. A real religious mindset has to place hope somewhere beyond the limits of our personal and immediate gratification.
“Whether we want to admit it or not, in conversation we’ll say climate, climate, climate. But we will vote economics, economics, economics,” he said.
In June the Ontario bishops’ justice and peace commission asked the bishops to lobby governments to declare a climate emergency. The request was passed up the ladder to the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, but Hansen doubts the CCCB will act.
“It doesn’t get anywhere,” he said.
Hansen doesn’t dispute that Catholics care about the planet. They care when they see floods swallowing up towns in Quebec and Manitoba, when they see massive forest fires reduce homes and communities to charred ruins, when they know we are losing hundreds of species of wildlife. He just thinks we don’t know how to translate our concern into action.
“It’s been in our conversation, but I don’t think it has much of any political punch,” he said.
But politicians say they’re ready to listen to religious lobbying on behalf of the environment.
"Laudato Si' is one of the most important pieces of writing for our civilization in decades."
“Laudato Si’ is one of the most important pieces of writing for our civilization in decades,” said Green Party leader Elizabeth May, an Anglican who has studied theology at Saint Paul University in Ottawa.
May’s party is currently polling at over 10 per cent nationwide. The poll tracking site 338.com projects the Greens could win between three and six seats — up from the current two, and perhaps a significant block in a minority government situation.
This federal election is essential if Canada is really going to live up to its Paris Agreement commitments, May said.
“We won’t get a second chance,” she told The Catholic Register. “We need 60-per-cent reductions in greenhouse gases by 2030, so that we can get to zero by 2050.”
May is mystified by Catholic politicians who reflect their faith on abortion and religious freedom, but ignore Pope Francis on the fate of the planet.
“When the Pope speaks to the profound moral question of whether this generation has the right to deprive the next generation essentially of a livable planet, that’s not a moral question with them,” she said.
Unsurprisingly, May wants as many religious voices as possible to contribute to Canada’s environmental policy debate.
“Most people will agree that God did not create this Earth and put us on it so that we could destroy it,” she said.
“I welcome input from religious communities,” said Conservative environment critic Ed Fast, MP for Abbotsford, B.C. “They all inform the positions that I take in Parliament, and the positions I share with my party.”
But Fast, a Mennonite, has not read Laudato Si’.
“Did you really expect me to have read it?” he asked The Catholic Register.
But Fast insists he sees Canada’s climate policies through a moral lens.
“I have yet to run into one person who would suggest that climate change is strictly an economic issue,” he said. “This is an issue about our stewardship of the world. As a person of faith myself, I take very seriously the importance of stewarding the environment in which we’ve been placed and which sustains us. I don’t think it’s at all wrong to place a moral compass on the debate.”
Environment and Climate Change Minister Catherine McKenna has called religious leaders to her office to discuss climate change, has spoken often about Laudato Si’ and has met with Pope Francis.
“I’m so pleased the Pope wrote this, because we now have an opportunity to have a broader conversation,” McKenna said as part of a panel discussing climate policy at Ottawa’s St. Georges Parish in February of 2017. “Caring about the environment is about the social justice calling. It’s about looking at the choices we make every day and how it impacts on the most vulnerable, how it impacts on future generations, how it impacts on species.”
But McKenna is also part of a government that bought a pipeline to ship bitumen in a slurry to Vancouver.
People have to get over the notion that religion has to be politically neutral, said Basilian Fr. Bob Holmes, director of social justice concerns for his order.
“Absolutely, we should be political. We should,” he said.
Using moral instincts embedded in religious conviction to choose a policy, a program or a party is something Catholics have always done.
“This crisis is real. So for us not to come out and say so — and as a Church really speak to our people — this is the time in terms of voting,” he said. “This is what we have to do. We’ve got to make sure our government listens.”
Religious orders have been beating the environmental drum for a long time and recently the Canadian Religious Conference formed JEM, or Joint Ecological Ministry, so that religious communities could collaborate and share their work on climate and ecology. But the religious aren’t finding it easy to frame their concerns politically.
“We certainly need to do more,” said Loretto Sr. Evanne Hunter. “There’s no question. And there’s no question that religious congregations generally are committed to this. But in terms of advocacy, I don’t think we’ve done all that much.”
Experience tells Development and Peace’s Luke Stocking that Catholics will take up the Laudato Si’ agenda this fall. When Canada’s Catholic development agency launched it’s “Create a Climate of Change” campaign right after Laudato Si’ was first printed in 2015, there was more parish participation in that campaign than Development and Peace had experienced in years. This fall, Development and Peace will go back to the well with a new climate and environment campaign designed to dovetail with the October Synod on the Amazon.
“I would expect and hope that that level of engagement at a parish level and a school level will continue to pick up,” Stocking said.
Catholic concern for climate change has to be urgent, bold and committed to the longer term — “Not just the outcomes of elections, but the policy that follows,” he said.
Stocking is realistic about uniting Canada’s Catholics on this or any issue.
“Since even the time of (the 1891 encyclical) Rerum Novarum, those who have really taken on the social teaching of the Church and wanted to make it front and centre of the Church’s engagement in the world — there’s always been a degree of marginalization. It’s nothing new,” he said.
“You just have to be faithful. You have to be hopeful. There are signs on this issue, particularly as the climate crisis becomes more and more acute. It will become easier and easier for that core group of activists to bring more people along — to bring more votes along.