Jim Derrick and Alfie Travassos exchange rings as they get married at the Salt Lake County Government Complex in Salt Lake City Oct. 6. In reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court declining to review rulings overturning state bans on same-sex marriage, U.S. Ca tholic bishops reiterated church teaching on traditional marriage, that it is a union between one man and one woman. CNS photo/Jim Urquhar, Reuters

U.S. bishops emphasize traditional marriage after Supreme Court action

  • October 9, 2014

WASHINGTON - After the U.S. Supreme Court Oct. 6 declined to review rulings overturning five states' bans on same-sex marriage, several U.S. bishops criticized the court's inaction and reiterated that according to Church teaching, traditional marriage is a union between one man and one woman.

Oklahoma City Archbishop Paul Coakley said the court's failure to review the Circuit Court decisions was "deeply disappointing."

"Marriage is not merely a human institution that can simply be redefined at will, but one established by our creator and necessary for human flourishing. Children deserve a mother and a father who are committed to a faithful and permanent union," he said.

North Carolina Bishops Peter Jugis of Charlotte and Michael Burbidge of Raleigh said in a statement: "Millions of Americans have looked to the Supreme Court to put this issue to rest by supporting marriage as being between one man and one woman. We know from our Catholic teaching that marriage is a permanent, faithful and fruitful covenant joining a man and a woman. It is our duty to continue to affirm marriage in this way, and it is our hope that the Supreme Court will ultimately agree."

The Colorado Catholic Conference, the public policy arm of the state's bishops, said the court's failure to review the rulings was "disappointing and advances a misunderstanding of the institution of marriage." The statement said that the court declining "to act will have a lasting and profound effect on the family structure."

"Our desire is for people of good will to continue to grow in the truth and joy of marriage, so that when society begins to see the bad fruits of this decision, our families and the Church will be there as joyful witnesses of the truth about the family and human sexuality," it added.

Colorado's bishops also said the situation shows how important it is for Catholics to be "involved in political life" and speak the truth about human sexuality, marriage and the human person.

The bishops of Indiana said it was unfortunate that the Supreme Court "did not take up the cases and respect the will of people of Indiana and other states." In a statement by the Indiana Catholic Conference, the bishops said that although "same-sex marriage may be legal in Indiana, the Church is not obligated to solemnize such ceremonies and will not change its teaching."

Glenn Tebbe, executive director of the Indiana Catholic Conference, said that "there is still a possibility that other appeals courts will rule differently and therefore the U.S. Supreme Court will have to resolve the issue."

The Virginia Catholic Conference said the Supreme Court's decision to decline to review the ruling that overturned Virginia's law "reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the intrinsic nature of marriage and represents an injustice to over a million Virginia voters, whose decision was to enshrine the understanding of marriage as the union of one man and one woman into our state's constitution."

The state's bishops said they will "continue to affirm the truth about marriage, the lifelong union of one man and one woman, as well as its essential importance to the common good. As pastors, teachers and faith leaders, we can do nothing less. It is our fervent hope that the Supreme Court will reconsider this fundamental issue in the future."

On Oct. 7, three judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the bans in Idaho and Nevada violated the equal protection rights of same-sex couples to legally marry. A day later, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy temporarily blocked the ruling allowing same-sex marriages in Idaho, after state authorities requested an emergency stay. According to The Associated Press, the delay is expected to last just a few days. About five hours later, Kennedy clarified that the stay applies only to Idaho, not to Nevada, which did not request such an injunction.

Comments (0)

There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Support The Catholic Register

Unlike many other news websites, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our site. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.