Andy Bannister, author of The Atheist Who Didn’t Exist. Photo courtesy of RZIM

Author tackles atheism with humour

By 
  • October 3, 2015

Laughter might truly be the best medicine if it can encourage friendly conversation between Christians and atheists. That was Andy Bannister’s goal when he wrote The Atheist Who Didn’t Exist.

In his new book, Bannister uses humour as a way to recognize and dissect what he calls “atheist sound bites,” common cliché arguments that are being used to support the New Atheism movement. He hopes that in writing this book he will be able to engage Christians and non-Christians alike.

“I often think that too much Christian literature, for those who are non-Christians, isn’t fun to read, so the humour is (in the book) for a reason,” said the British author. “I wanted to write an apologetics book that is fun to read, so that when (a reader) gives it to an atheist friend ... (he or she) can say to them, ‘Look, you might not agree with everything in this book, but you’ll enjoy it.’ ”

Bannister begins each chapter with a scenario that exposes what he calls the lazy skepticism that many atheists use today. In the first chapter of his book, Bannister tells the story of how he first came across London’s “atheist bus.”

An ad on a London bus reads, “There is probably no God. So stop worrying and enjoy your life.” The advertisement, sponsored by the British Humanist Association, is a good example of a bad argument.

“An argument so bad, so disastrous, in fact, that one has to wonder what its sponsors were thinking... Like a cheaply made cardigan, they’re full of loose threads, that if tugged firmly, quickly began to unravel,” Bannister writes.

“But here’s my question: what’s the connection between the non-existence of something and any effect, emotional or otherwise? There probably aren’t any unicorns, cheer up. The Flying Spaghetti Monster is just a parody, so take heart.”

Beyond the first part of the ad’s claim, the second part is not much stronger. Bannister writes that the slogan might be a symptom of a general trend in culture to zero in on the emotion of enjoyment. He writes that to be authentically human, there is considerably more to life than to experience the one emotion of joy. Without joy, he asks what principle does New Atheism have for times of trial?

It is with bad arguments like these that Bannister opens discussion on the danger of lazy slogans to reduce complex arguments for New Atheism.

“In many Western countries, atheism has become seen now as the default position,” he said. “People assume atheism is the only position for someone who wishes to appear educated, sophisticated, urbane and rational. Best way to do that is to have a British accent. If you don’t have that, be an atheist.”

A large portion of Bannister’s characteristically British humour is often embedded in the footnotes of his book, where he refers readers to literature for further reading and the occasional punchline.

Bannister explained that using clever quips to address the flaws of bad arguments is a much more effective way to engage people in debate. For this technique, he cites C.S. Lewis as his inspiration.

“I remember C.S. Lewis, one of my heroes, explaining that one of the reasons he wrote fiction... was that he came to realize that the front entrance of people’s minds was often guarded by what he called ‘watchful dragons,’ things like cynicism and pride and bad arguments,” said Bannister.

“I’ve had this experience with atheist friends where you present to them what you think is a really compelling argument of who Jesus is and it just bounced off them... But narrative and story, as (Lewis) put it, can steal past those watchful dragons and take the truth into the side door.”

As the director and lead apologist of Canada’s Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM), Bannister has found himself in many debates with atheist colleagues. A common criticism that he encounters is that atheists do not have to prove their non-belief.

During an appearance on Justin Bierley’s Unbelievable podcast, Bannister appeared with Ed Turner, an atheist writer and blogger, for a discussion on whether atheism is a belief system.

Turner, who is a solicitor by trade, criticized the book for being “a tactic to try and put the burden of proof on the other side.”

Turner said that because atheism is a non-belief, it is the believer’s responsibility to provide the right evidence to prove that God exists.

However, Bannister believes the burden of proof should be equal.

“I actually ended (the discussion) saying that this is not an attempt to push the burden of proof,” he told The Catholic Register.
“With that said, I would put one more qualifier on that. I think it’s hugely important, whenever you believe in anything... that you are willing to live out the consequences of your belief system. If you are not, I question whether you actually believe it.”

Bannister calls this the “livability test,” which he explains further in The Atheist Who Didn’t Exist. Bannister argues that if humans are just atoms and particles, people would abandon the idea of treating each other with dignity and respect.

“That’s not so much burden of proof as it is burden of livability and I think the Christian worldview is the only one you can live out consistently,” said Bannister. “Even if atheism is true and Christianity is false, wouldn’t you prefer to be treated with value and as precious, rather than just being treated as atoms and particles?”

Bannister admits the arguments he presents are not the end of the debate between Christians and atheists, but he hopes that it becomes the start of a more productive discussion.

“My prayer for my book is that it really gets into the hands of atheists and skeptics. It doesn’t just sit on the shelves for Christians, but the Lord will actually use it,” he said. “Books can go where we can’t.”

Comments (15)

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Good review and the book was fantastic — as a former atheist, I recognise some of the bad arguments I'd bought up to when I was under the sway of the New Atheism. There's a free chapter of it here, btw: http://theatheistwhodidntexist.com

Jemima
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

"A common criticism that he encounters is that atheists do not have to prove their non-belief." Do I need to prove my non-belief for all the made up gods or just yours?! This book is hilarious alright.

Tony
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

"Even if atheism is true and Christianity is false, wouldn’t you prefer to be treated with value and as precious, rather than just being treated as atoms and particles?"

Spoken like someone who has never once bothered to ask an atheist about...

"Even if atheism is true and Christianity is false, wouldn’t you prefer to be treated with value and as precious, rather than just being treated as atoms and particles?"

Spoken like someone who has never once bothered to ask an atheist about their worldview.

Read More
Mark
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Atheism is a belief like not collecting stamps is a hobby. I was disappointed with the intellectual rigor presented in this column.

Bea
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

"There probably aren’t any unicorns, cheer up."

It would seem [t]his argument is with the KJV, not atheists...


-jjg

J. Gravelle
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

“An argument so bad, so disastrous, in fact,..." Bannister argues, and then counters with two false analogies. Countering a so-called "bad" argument with obvious logical fallacies is not convincing at all. Bannister must have slept through his...

“An argument so bad, so disastrous, in fact,..." Bannister argues, and then counters with two false analogies. Countering a so-called "bad" argument with obvious logical fallacies is not convincing at all. Bannister must have slept through his Logic 101 class while in college.

Read More
Allen
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Doesn't Christianity limit your value to whether or not you are making your god happy? Sounds like a terrible way to live. I'd rather accept that things in life happen than be told that all the bad things in the world are because I'm pissing...

Doesn't Christianity limit your value to whether or not you are making your god happy? Sounds like a terrible way to live. I'd rather accept that things in life happen than be told that all the bad things in the world are because I'm pissing off some deity somehow.

Read More
Mary
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

"Bannister argues that if humans are just atoms and particles, people would abandon the idea of treating each other with dignity and respect."

Even if we atheists were to concede this point (we don't, read "Good Without God"), that wouldn't...

"Bannister argues that if humans are just atoms and particles, people would abandon the idea of treating each other with dignity and respect."

Even if we atheists were to concede this point (we don't, read "Good Without God"), that wouldn't change the truth value of Christianity at all.

Read More
Michael M
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

"I think it’s hugely important, whenever you believe in anything... that you are willing to live out the consequences of your belief system."

Torture is momentary on earth, but eternal in hell. This led medieval Christians to develop famously...

"I think it’s hugely important, whenever you believe in anything... that you are willing to live out the consequences of your belief system."

Torture is momentary on earth, but eternal in hell. This led medieval Christians to develop famously brutal torture devices to convert "heathens." Logic!

Read More
I, J
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

"Bannister believes the burden of proof should be equal."
Of course he does, theists always do, they have no evidence for what can not be proven so relieving yourself of the burden of proof is quite helpful if you can pull it off.

James Minion
There are no comments posted here yet
Load More

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible, which has become acutely important amid the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.