Catholic pilgrims walk past shops selling souvenirs on Via Dolorosa in Jerusalem’s Old City. CNS photo/Finbarr O’Reilly, Reuters

Via Dolorosa pilgrims not troubled over exact route

By  Judith Sudilovsky, Catholic News Service
  • April 2, 2015

JERUSALEM - Several pilgrim groups gathered in a sunny courtyard in Jerusalem’s Old City. They were preparing to follow a tradition reaching back at least to the fifth century: walking along the Via Dolorosa, through the cobbled streets of Jerusalem’s Old City.

The Via Dolorosa represents the route taken by Jesus on the way to His crucifixion, until He was laid in the tomb. Although the route followed for this devotion has changed over the centuries, the need and desire of the Christian faithful to walk in Jesus’ footsteps has not. The current route was probably formalized in the 18th century.

“To follow the actual footsteps of Jesus is pretty amazing. It brings His message even more into our hearts,” said Marilyn McDonough, 64, a Catholic from Santa Clara, Calif. “I keep thinking about all the suffering He did for us and what He went through mentally and physically. It is overwhelming for me to be here.”

At the same time, she said, she is aware that no one knows for certain the exact places where Jesus walked. The restored 12th-century Chapel of the Flagellation that stands in the courtyard today was built on the location of a fifth-century church.

“If you take the whole area of Jerusalem, I know Jesus walked in this area. Did He step in this very spot? Maybe not, but I know He walked in other spots, and if I walk around here I can feel it in my heart,” she said.

There is no clear consensus among biblical scholars that this current Via Dolorosa tradition is the actual route taken by Jesus. It is based on the assumption that the Pretorium, where Pontius Pilate judged Jesus, would have been at that time the Antonia Fortress, built by King Herod.

With no hard archeological evidence of where the Pretorium was, where Jesus’ trial took place and which path He took to His own crucifixion, scholars of biblical history base their assumptions upon what they know of the layout and social mores of the Roman-occupied city of Jerusalem of that time. Some, like archeologist Amit Reem, believe that one probability is that the Roman governor would have stayed in the palace of the Judean king during his stays in Jerusalem, and he would have judged Jesus from there. The palace is thought to have been in what is today’s Tower of David Museum just inside Jaffa Gate.
Reem, who works for the Israel Antiquities Authority, recently finished 10 years of excavation work revealing the foundations and a drainage system of King Herod’s palace in one of the museum buildings.

“It can be fair to think that Pontius Pilate, the Roman representative of Caesar, stayed in Herod’s Palace while in Jerusalem,” said Reem, standing outside the ruins of the monumental steps leading to what is believed to have been Herod’s famous pools. The area was excavated in the 1980s by archeologist Rene Sivan. Using an outdoor screen, the museum shows a virtual recreation of the palace pools according to first-century descriptions of the palace.

Reem noted that early Christians did not follow the current Via Dolorosa route. He said the Via Dolorosa was south of Jaffa Gate, starting from Mt. Zion, where Christians from the fifth and sixth centuries identified the Pretorium, leading from near Dung Gate to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.

“Though we do not find any actual evidence that (Herod’s Palace) is the place where Jesus’ trial was held, it is a logical, theoretical estimation that it could’ve been here,” he said.

Franciscan Father Eugenio Alliata, professor of Christian archeology at the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, however, is not convinced. In his thinking, the Roman governor would have needed to stay near the place of most importance for Judaism to be on guard for any unrest during the Jewish pilgrimage holiday of Passover, when thousands of Jews, including Jesus, would ascend to the Temple Mount to give the required offerings. That would place him in Herod’s Antonia Fortress which, according to Franciscan tradition, stood at the site of the modern Franciscan chapels.

“The actual Via Dolorosa (procession) never started at the Citadel of King David,” Alliata said. “It is possible that in history it was used as the Pretorium, but Christians never used it to determine the place of the crucifixion.”

For most pilgrims, debates over the original route do not matter. As his group prepared to leave the Franciscan compound and begin the procession, Benevil Rosa, a Catholic from Brazil, noted that walking along the path would help transform the love of Jesus into a spiritual reality.

“It brings the love into practice,” Rosa said. “What people feel in their hearts and what they do in reality is more important than the actual location.”

Nigerian pilgrims sang a traditional hymn; an Asian group stood in orderly rows, chanting a prayer and led by a pilgrim carrying a large cross. Groups from Eastern Europe and the United States stood in different corners of the courtyard, some listening as a guide presented religious and historical explanations of the place, while others bent their heads in silent or communal prayer.

Starting with the first station, in the courtyard of the nearby el-’Omariyya Muslim school, they would all walk the same path, stopping to pray and reflect at the traditional 14 stations, with the final five located inside the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.

Some of the pilgrim groups walked the path carrying a cross as Jesus did. On Fridays the Franciscans lead an official procession along the Via Dolorosa.

Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.