Chicago Archbishop Blase J. Cupich of Chicago, pictured here, and Bishop Kevin J. Farrell of Dallas are calling for a ban on the sale of military-style assault weapons. CNS photo/Karen Callaway, Catholic New World

U.S. bishops seek assault weapons ban, say civilians have no need for them

By  Dennis Sadowski, Catholic News Service
  • June 25, 2016

WASHINGTON – Two U.S. church leaders called for a ban on the sale of military-style assault weapons, saying they have no place in the hands of civilians.

Archbishop Blase J. Cupich of Chicago and Bishop Kevin J. Farrell of Dallas issued their appeals in response to recent incidents in which people have been killed by attackers armed with semi-automatic rifles.

"There's no reason in the world why these guns are available. There's no logic," Bishop Farrell told Catholic News Service June 22.

The bishops' stance puts them in opposition to gun rights advocates, who say that any effort to limit the sale and acquisition of firearms would violate the Second Amendment of the Constitution.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops was weighing a statement June 23 as the national debate on the need for action on gun control rose in intensity. Since the mid-1990s, the bishops have called for "sensible regulation" and "reasonable restrictions" on firearms.

Bishop Farrell's appeal came in a June 13 blog, a day after a gunman killed 49 revelers in an Orlando, Florida, nightclub.

In a separate statement, Archbishop Cupich responded to a string of violence in Chicago the weekend of June 18-19 in which 13 people were killed and more than 40 others were injured in shootings. One victim, Salvador Suarez, 21, was killed by an assailant with an assault rifle outside of a Catholic Church as worshippers attended Mass.

Bishop Farrell specifically pointed to the rising use of semi-automatic rifles in attacks as cause for concern and said he decided to express his moral outrage over inaction by Congress in the blog on the diocesan website. Readers overwhelmingly opposed his views in comments on the blog.

"I think of the children who died in Connecticut. I think of the people who died in the movie theater (in Aurora, Colorado). I think of the people in San Bernardino. I think of Orlando. What I think is what other motive would we need (to ban such weapons) than to see the way those people lost their lives?" he said.

"I ask myself, 'What's the common denominator in all this?' The latest incident in Orlando, a person who should not have been able to get his hands on a military-style weapon that's destined and designed to kill did. This is not a gun that is used for self-defense. This is a gun that's an attack gun," the bishop told CNS.

"I respect the Second Amendment," he added. "If (people) want to have a handgun, that's their business. The argument that the politicians give is that if we give them (gun control advocates) an inch, they'll take a mile. On what basis do they make that statement?"

The blog marked the second time Bishop Farrell addressed the topic of guns in a blog this year. In January, he raised moral questions about Texas' open carry law that took effect Jan. 1, saying it was unfortunate that the state became the 45th to "embrace the cowboy mentality that permits the open carrying of guns."

The Texas law allows firearms to be banned from church property as long as appropriate signage is posted. Bishop Farrell's decision to not allow weapons in churches met with a mixed response, with some readers supporting his stand while others were critical of it in the comments section of the blog.

Atlanta Archbishop Wilton D. Gregory took a similar step in 2014 when Georgia allowed licensed gun owners to carry firearms in public places, including churches.

Quoting spiritual writer Father Henri Nouwen, Archbishop Cupich said June 20 that the city's "terrible violence is destroying not only those killed and wounded, but all of us."

"If we want to survive as a community that treasures life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, we must act now to put an end to this carnage," the archbishop said. "No doubt there are many causes, but we can start by getting these combat weapons off our streets."

Archbishop Cupich urged the entire city to step up to end the violence. "Doing nothing is no longer an option," he said.

Action on any gun control measure has been repeatedly blocked by gun rights backers in Congress. In protest, House Democrats held what they called a "sit-in" that began June 22 and extended overnight to protest Republican leaders' inaction on guns following the Orlando massacre.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, called the action a "nothing more than a publicity stunt" and adjourned the House session until July 5. Democrats pledged to continue to occupy the House floor throughout the 12-day recess.

In the Senate, two Republican and two Democratic gun-related measures failed to gain the necessary 60 votes for passage June 20. The measures, which observers said had little chance of passage, would have tightened background checks for firearms buyers at gun shows and on the internet; prevented anyone on the federal terrorism watch list from buying firearms or explosives; and addressed the need for improved mental health service to identify potential attackers.

After the votes, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, introduced a so-called "no fly, no buy" bill to prevent individuals on the federal watch lists from obtaining firearms. Collins was flanked by Republican and Democratic senators when she discussed the bill during a June 21 news conference.

About 81,000 people, including about 1,000 American citizens, are on the FBI's no fly list. Another 28,000 are on a "selectee" list and are subject to unusually intensive screening before flying.

"Essentially we believe if you are too dangerous to fly on an airplane, you are too dangerous to buy a gun," Collins said.

She said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, pledged to allow a vote on the bill at an specified future date.

Collins' legislation also would allow anyone denied a gun to appeal through the federal courts and to recover legal costs in pursuing their case. It protects FBI counter-terrorism investigations and includes a "look back" provision to promptly notify the agency if a person who has been in the screening database within the last five years if they have purchased a firearm.

The National Rifle Association opposes Collins' measure, calling instead for a stronger effort to fight the Islamic State group and reduce its influence in radicalizing people to strike public venues.

The NRA and other gun rights groups have long opposed any limits on guns including reinstitution of an assault weapons ban, expanded background checks and waiting periods to complete gun sales. Instead, they have sought expanded access to firearms, saying that responsible gun owners could have slowed or stopped attacks before a large amount of deaths and injuries resulted.

A report by the Congressional Research Service in 2012 estimated that 310 million firearms were in civilian hands, including 114 million handguns, 110 million rifles and 86 million shotguns, roughly one weapon for every person in the U.S.

Comments (8)

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

The more I hear from the "bishops" and the "pope" the more I think we don't need them
My more than 70 years as a Catholic are being sorely test by the poor excuses that we now have "leading" the Church.

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

These are stoops for the demonic modernists that infect the Church and weaponry is not their specialty. How about teaching Eschatology for once instead of socialist ideology?

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

If Jesus Christ was against gun control why are the Bishops for it? The following is from Luke 22:36 "He said to them, "But now, let him who has a purse take it, and likewise a bag. And let him who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.""

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Does this opinion apply to those living under ISIS control?

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

USCCB = Democrat loving, money-spending buerocracy that churns out verbiage no one reads or cares about.

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

As soon as these 'Bishops' remove the locks from their doors I may think about giving up my gun but it is not too likely as the criminals will still have them.

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Ignorant.

My family has been Catholic for over 10 generations (both sides). That family has included multiple nuns and priests.

That faithfulness will be ruptured, and soon, if this nonsense does not stop.

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

As a Catholic, I am frankly embarrassed when I see the Church stepping outside of religious concerns to dictate to us about gun control. The Church seems to be ignorant of the important role that firearms play in protecting innocent life and is...

As a Catholic, I am frankly embarrassed when I see the Church stepping outside of religious concerns to dictate to us about gun control. The Church seems to be ignorant of the important role that firearms play in protecting innocent life and is dabbling with things it has no expertise in.

Read More
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

Support The Catholic Register

Unlike many other news websites, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our site. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.