U.S. bishops, college presidents seek dialogue after Notre Dame controversy

By  Chaz Muth, Catholic News Service
  • June 19, 2009
{mosimage}WASHINGTON - In the wake of the University of Notre Dame controversy involving U.S. President Barack Obama delivering its 2009 commencement address, some U.S. bishops and Catholic university presidents are preparing for dialogue aimed at reaching a consensus about speakers on their campuses.

During the early June conference of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities ' board of directors in San Diego, the governing body of the group said they would like to see the bishops revisit their 2004 statement "Catholics in Political Life," which says it's inappropriate for Catholic institutions to honour or provide a platform to someone who holds positions contrary to the teachings of the church.

Two bishops attending the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' spring meeting in San Antonio told the National Catholic Reporter June 17 they also see a need for dialogue with Catholic university presidents about this issue, and perhaps revisit the bishops' 2004 statement.

Though no talks have been scheduled, representatives from both groups said they hoped to have initial discussions before the bishops meet in November for their annual fall meeting.

A national public debate between some bishops and Catholic higher education leaders erupted this spring after Notre Dame in Indiana announced Obama would be its commencement speaker and receive an honorary degree. Various bishops and other critics viewed the president as an inappropriate choice because he supports keeping abortion legal. Some of the bishops said Notre Dame defied their 2004 statement.

A number of Catholic college leaders countered that Obama was being honoured for his leadership on other issues that are in line with Catholic social teaching, and that his presence at the 2009 Notre Dame graduation was not an endorsement of the president's position on abortion.

"Something happened that's been disruptive, and that says to me we need to sit down and talk this through to come to some better understanding," said Bishop Gerald Kicanas, vice president of the U.S. bishops conference, in an interview with the National Catholic Reporter. "I don't think anyone felt good about what took place."

The Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities' board of directors would like to see the bishops update or prepare a successor policy to the 2004 statement regarding honours and platforms for speakers at Catholic institutions of higher education, said Richard Yanikoski, president of the group that lists 245 Catholic colleges and universities as its members, including Notre Dame.

"The ACCU is encouraging more dialogue with the bishops, collectively and individually, and not necessarily more documents that are written at a particular moment, but survive indefinitely," Yanikoski told Catholic News Service June 17.

"Ultimately, that is the problem with the 2004 document. It was written in the moment of political heat," during the 2004 U.S. presidential election.

He maintained the 2004 statement is incomplete, has internal ambiguities, uses language that is not consistent with canon law and that its application is subject to interpretation.

It is possible the bishops will revisit their 2004 statement in the coming months, said Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Curry, chair of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Education, in an interview with the National Catholic Reporter.

"The 2004 statement is analogous to our statement on political activity before each election," Curry told NCR.

"It's not a matter of faith and morals in the sense that we're defining something. It's a matter of how we react to a constantly moving situation in the country."

The association would also like to see the bishops give a clear definition about the authority local bishops have with regard to Catholic colleges in their jurisdiction, Yanikoski said.

Discussions between the bishops and Catholic college presidents will likely begin with the bishops' education committee when it meets this fall, shortly before the November bishops' general meeting, Yanikoski said.

At least one Catholic organization has said it doesn't want the bishops to make any changes to its 2004 statement.

"Lobbying the bishops to back off a perfectly reasonable policy would be a shameful action by the Catholic higher education establishment, and hardly an appropriate response to Notre Dame's betrayal of the nation's bishops and the university's own Catholic mission," said Patrick Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society, a Manassas, Va.-based Catholic college watchdog group.

The Cardinal Newman Society launched an unsuccessful campaign for Notre Dame to rescind its invitation to have Obama deliver the commencement address.

"The lesson of the Notre Dame scandal is clear," Reilly said in a June 17 statement. "Even our leading Catholic universities have lost their way, and they need precisely the sort of clear direction from the bishops that the 2004 policy on Catholic honours and platforms represents."

Curry and Yanikoski said it is an issue that should be worked out between the bishops and college presidents.

Comments (0)

There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Support The Catholic Register

Unlike many other news websites, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our site. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.