Reg Hartt looks at his replica of the Shroud of Turin which he has on display in his home for visitors to see. This is one of the reasons he is battling city hall. Photo by Michael Swan

Shroud of Turin replica caught in bylaw battle

By 
  • November 25, 2016

TORONTO – It takes faith to thumb your nose at city hall, and Reg Hartt has plenty.

After first threatening to stop the Toronto man from inviting people into his house to look at a replica of the Shroud of Turin, city officials now say they only want Hartt’s in-home movie screenings and lectures to fall into line with zoning laws.

It’s not the first time Toronto bureaucracy has tried to shut down Hartt, the man behind Toronto’s Cineforum. In 2011 it came down to then-mayor Rob Ford to overturn a Municipal Licensing and Standards decision which had shut down Hartt’s living room theatre-cum-lecture-hall for several months.

This time, it’s not his right to show movies but his penchant for talking about faith that got Hartt in trouble with Toronto zoning law. In June, the city claimed Hartt was operating a church, contrary to his Bathurst Street residential zoning.

“I never said I was operating a church. I’m not operating a church, per se,” said Hartt. “But the meaning of the word church is community. I am open to the community. I am part of the community.”

Four-and-a-half months later, the city seems to have backed off the church charges, but is still upset about Hartt’s in-home movie lectures. In an email to The Catholic Register, city officials claim they wanted Hartt to submit an application for a “Preliminary Project Review” so the city could determine whether Cineforum “could continue to operate without going through a full zoning review.”

It’s against the city’s zoning bylaw to operate a movie theatre in a residential area.

Hartt has no intention of applying to do something he’s been doing for more than 30 years. No preliminary project review application has been submitted. On Oct. 26 the city sent Hartt a letter offering to assist him with the application, “so that no additional enforcement action has to be taken.”

“I’m not worried about that (enforcement),” said Hartt.

Hartt obtained his certified replica of the Shroud of Turin from the Shroud of Turin Education and Research Association, Inc. in July of 2015 for $3,000. The Shroud of Turin Education and Research Association is run by Barrie Schwortz, who was the official photographer for a 1978 scientific investigation into the authenticity of the shroud.

The Vatican has owned the shroud since 1983 but makes no comment about its authenticity.

For his $3,000, Hartt received both the full-sized cotton replica and “permission to publicly display it in an appropriate manner in a setting or venue of your choice,” according to a letter from Schwortz.

Hartt doesn’t make money directly off the replica shroud, but does receive contributions from Cineforum film fanatics.

Hartt said it isn’t the city’s business if he wants to invite strangers into his house to look at the shroud and discuss Jesus.

“The city said you can’t do this. You can’t invite strangers into your home. I said, ‘Well I’m not seeing them as strangers. I’m seeing them as family.’ ”

Looking at strangers and calling them family is a central tenant of Hartt’s own interpretation of the gospels, which he developed in the 1960s and ’70s based on his reading of the Chinese text I Ching, and then a 1970 bus ride to Hollywood during which he read a pocket New Testament five times.

“I’ve been living a life based on faith since 1968. One of the things the I Ching teaches is that we are to see strangers as friends. Of course the Gospel teaches we see strangers as family,” Hartt said.

Hartt has offered his replica shroud to his childhood Catholic parish in Minto, N.B., but was told the parish needed permission from the bishop before it went ahead with that kind of display. His hometown’s hesitation may be what has put Hartt off organized religion.

“I accept Jesus and reject Christianity,” a provocative Hartt writes on his website.

Meanwhile, Hartt continues to offer his replica shroud “to any diocese or any church, Catholic or non-Catholic.”

Hartt’s belief in the shroud, which many see as a medieval forgery, is unshakable.

“The shroud has been called the fifth Gospel,” Hartt said. “And it is. It bears witness to the passion, the suffering and the Resurrection…. The science now bears out that everything in the Gospels is true, which is astonishing.”

Hartt caught the attention of several newspapers over the summer for his battle with city hall, but in conversation he doesn’t seem worried about byaw enforcement.

“The city can shut me down. I mean, you know Jesus? They threw Him in the tomb and they thought that was that. It wasn’t. I’m Irish and we Irish love fights.”

Comments (2)

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

A Tibetan Lama who crossed Canada with the Dali Lama said, "You are a Crazy-Wisdom-Yogin." I said, "I hear crazy often enough. What does the rest mean?" He said, "It's the highest compliment I can pay. It means you are living absolutely the life...

A Tibetan Lama who crossed Canada with the Dali Lama said, "You are a Crazy-Wisdom-Yogin." I said, "I hear crazy often enough. What does the rest mean?" He said, "It's the highest compliment I can pay. It means you are living absolutely the life you are teaching." I said, "I'm not. I miss the mark."

Read More
Reginald Hartt
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I truly believe that The Shroud of Turin was never associated with Jesus. And I testify that the Gospel of John the Apostle is true. And should be trusted more than a salesman's pitch. And it proves that Jesus was wrapped in more than one cloth.
...

I truly believe that The Shroud of Turin was never associated with Jesus. And I testify that the Gospel of John the Apostle is true. And should be trusted more than a salesman's pitch. And it proves that Jesus was wrapped in more than one cloth.
John 20
5 And he stooping down, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in.
6 Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie,
7 And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.

The Gospel of John (20:7) tells us that the napkin, which was placed over the face of Jesus, was not just thrown aside like the grave clothes. The Bible takes an entire verse to tell us that the napkin was neatly folded, and was placed separate from the grave clothes.

Early Sunday morning, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene came to the tomb and found that the stone had been rolled away from the entrance. She ran and found Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved. She said, 'They have taken the Lord's body out of the tomb, and I don't know where they have put him!' Peter and the other disciple ran to the tomb to see.. The other disciple outran Peter and got there first. He stooped and looked in and saw the linen cloth lying there, but he didn't go in.
Then Simon Peter arrived and went inside. He also noticed the linen wrappings lying there, while the cloth that had covered Jesus' head was folded up and John 20:7 And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.
lying to the side.
Was that important? Absolutely!

Is it really significant? Yes!
In order to understand the significance of the folded napkin, you have to understand a little bit about Hebrew tradition of that day. The folded napkin had to do with the Master and Servant, and every Jewish boy knew this tradition.
When the servant set the dinner table for the master, he made sure that it was exactly the way the master wanted it..
The table was furnished perfectly, and then the servant would wait, just out of sight, until the master had finished eating, and the servant would not dare touch that table, until the master was finished. Now, if the master were done eating, he would rise from the table, wipe his fingers, his mouth, and clean his beard, and would wad up that napkin and toss it onto the table.
The servant would then know to clear the table. For in those days, the wadded napkin meant, 'I'm done'.
But if the master got up from the table, and folded his napkin, and laid it beside his plate, the servant would not dare touch the table,
because........... The folded napkin meant,
'I'm coming back!'

HE'S COMING BACK!!!!"
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/65773-the-napkin-in-john-2027/

Read More
Dr. Jamie
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Support The Catholic Register

Unlike many other news websites, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our site. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.