Husband and wife kneel in prayer in front of church altar. “If our child began to question his/her own sexuality, our answers would be based on biblical perspectives,” the couple wrote in an email to Alberta Child and Family Services March 6. CNS photo/Dave Crenshaw

Edmonton couple’s adoption bid rejected because of religious beliefs, suit claims

By 
  • November 13, 2017
A Christian couple in Edmonton has filed a lawsuit against Alberta Child and Family Services claiming the agency denied their application to adopt due to their religious beliefs about marriage and sexuality. 

The married couple, identified in the court application filed Nov. 1 as “C.D.” and “N.D.,” believe their application was denied after Catholic Social Services (CSS) expressed concern about the couple’s ability to “support children who are questioning their sexuality.”

CSS is a Catholic social services agency that operates under the Archdiocese of Edmonton. CSS and Alberta Child and Family Services have yet to review claims made in the couple's court application.

“Our government believes that every adoptive child deserves a safe, healthy, loving and inclusive home," Aaron Manton, press secretary of the Ministry of Children's Services in Alberta, wrote in an email statement. 

"We want to ensure that, in all cases, the adoption process gives both children and parents the best possible outcomes, which is why the application process is thorough and rigorous.”

According to the affidavit, the couple was asked about their views on marriage and sexuality during a home study report in March 2017 where a CSS caseworker evaluated their ability to provide a safe home environment. 

“If our child began to question his/her own sexuality, our answers would be based on biblical perspectives,” the couple wrote in an email to Alberta Child and Family Services March 6. 

“Our hope is that by providing a stable, loving home and openly discussing our values (and reasons for them) with our children, they would want to follow our example.” 

On March 13, the couple was notified by CSS of their “non-approval” status. The affidavit states there were concerns that a “match would break down” and potentially the couple would return a child placed with them if the child struggled with their sexuality. 

“I was angry at the injustice of the situation,” C.D. stated in the court affidavit. “Despite our stability, our kindness, our dedication to helping people, despite our willingness to take a child in who needed parents, and consider him or her our own for the rest of our lives, we were being discriminated against based on our religious beliefs.”

The married couple has no children and are unable to conceive due to medical complications. 

Comments (1)

  1. Mrs. Alison Beil

This is shamefully dishonest of the Alberta and Federal governments of Canada. Those governments and courts are also guilty of dishonesty and secrecy in many other cases such as the 60's scoop, and their secretive and illegal practices with...

This is shamefully dishonest of the Alberta and Federal governments of Canada. Those governments and courts are also guilty of dishonesty and secrecy in many other cases such as the 60's scoop, and their secretive and illegal practices with Tasers and other secrecy privileges they reserve for themselves. When I was 10 years old Alberta prevailed on my parent's empathy for a child they said was in desperate need of being adopted as he had been neglected by his biological mother and was placed in foster homes that did not want him. He was already 4 years old - and we were lied to as the female social worker and MD's told us he was healthy and normal of mixed indigenous Canadian and caucasian heritage - born in British Columbia. In reality it was discovered within a few years that he had fetal alcohol disorder and schizophrenia. He moved when he became adult age to Ontario and about 20 years later at age 40 he suffered an altercation where police were called in Hamilton who took him to a hospital where a coroner said he'd died of a brain hemorrhage, and claimed there was no foul play. The government also lies about the promotion of gestational surrogacy for profit by atheist doctors, non-christian counsellors and politicians who promote the false notion that human beings are "reproducible" under the Canada Health Act, along with false advertising to the effect that "everyone deserves the right to become a parent, even if single and never married or gay or lesbian married couples even if they pay nothing in taxes and have done harm to themselves to render themselves unfit for parenting and incapable of fertility or gestation of a baby. I have registered my complaints about the false and untrue practices of the Government of Canada, the Courts, the errantly worded "Assisted Human Reproductive Act" and "pacific fertility.ca" with Alberta Health, the Edmonton Police, the Prime Minister, and Premier of Alberta.

Read More
  Attachments
  Comment was last edited 1 day ago by Ena Goquiolay Ena Goquiolay
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

Comment

humanae

Fr. Raymond J. De Souza: Canada took wrong side in Humanae Vitae debate 

Paul VI was standing on the shore as a cultural tsunami was about to hit. The bishops of Canada decided to leave him there alone.

Faith

Pope's homily

Features