Teresa Lubinski addresses her fellow trustees at the Toronto Catholic District School Board meeting while Ida Li Preti, left, and chair Maria Rizzo look on. Joshua Santos

Toronto Catholic board votes to include gender terms

By 
  • November 8, 2019

The controversial gender debate at the Toronto Catholic District School Board came to end in the early morning hours of Nov. 8 with the board voting to include gender terms in its code of conduct.

NOTE: This story has been updated to clarify the position of the Archdiocese of Toronto on the issue.

The resolution followed the dissemination of a misleading report to trustees on the eve of the vote that suggested the Archdiocese of Toronto was on side with a provincial government mandate to include the terms “gender expression, gender identity, family status and marital status” in the revised code.

In fact, the archdiocese opposed terms that are “not compatible with our faith,” but felt its options were limited in dealing with a board of trustees and a Ministry of Education that was intent on inserting gender terms into the board’s code of conduct. 

In the end, the archdiocese persuaded trustees to include additional language to ensure the code would “be interpreted through the lens of the Catholic faith as articulated by the teachings of the Church and protected in legislation.”

Responding to criticism from some Catholics who were reacting to misleading information in the media, the archdiocese issued a statement on Nov. 11 to clarify its position. It reiterated its commitment to fostering safe environments for all students and stated: “While the archdiocese recognizes that terms such as gender identity are included in the Code, we do not accept the view of the human person which underlies this terminology, since that view is not compatible with our faith.”

The statement also noted that the revised code requires school boards to interpret the code “as expressed through various documents of the universal Church, the bishops of Canada, the bishops of Ontario and the Archdiocese of Toronto.”

Ontario’s Ministry of Education had instructed school boards to include the revised language in their codes of conduct by Nov. 4. Opponents to the changes argued that the wording violates Catholic beliefs on gender and natural law, while proponents insisted that schools must have inclusive language that reflected cultural trends regarding sexuality and the family.

The final vote at the seven-hour meeting was 8-4, with Garry Tanuan, Michael Del Grande, Nancy Crawford and Teresa Lubinski voting against the motion. Those trustees had passed a motion in a sub-committee on Oct. 30 to eliminate all specific categories of groups protected from discrimination in favour of a code that was broadly inclusive of all people.

The new language now reads that all members of the school community must “respect and treat others fairly, regardless of, for example, race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status or disability.”

Crawford, Ward 12 Scarborough trustee, said she opposed the motion because she objects to listing specific characteristics in the code.

"The Human Rights Code requires many different grounds of which you can't discriminate against anyone, and we were coming from the perspective that every person is worthy of immeasurable love, respect, and dignity because we are all children of God," said Crawford.

Board chair Maria Rizzo supported the change.

My prayers came true. God was listening to the right side,” she said.

Parent Christopher Elliot, whose daughter attends a Catholic secondary school, was among more than 100 people at the board meeting. He opposed changes to the code’s language. 

“I’m concerned that our society and our government is slowly taking away our rights as parents to raise our children according to our Catholic beliefs and values,” Elliot told trustees. “This assault on our freedoms is glossed over with words like inclusion and tolerance, values that are already enshrined in Church teachings.”

Rizzo said it’s important to include everybody, make them like they aren’t discriminated against and aren’t excluded. 

“God made us in His image,” said Rizzo. “All of us have differences. We have different colour skin, we have different coloured eyes, we different coloured hair, we have different bodies. We need to celebrate our differences and make sure our children from the LGBTQ community and families from the LGBTQ community are supported and welcomed.”

Rizzo said students may not be as fearful as they once were, knowing that they are supported by the board.

Crawford said she's concerned additional terms for prohibited grounds of discrimination may be added by the Ontario Human Rights Commission. 

"There's no predicting when something like this will come up again, and it might be viewed differently by the Roman Catholic Church at the time or the board of trustees at the time," said Crawford.

(With files from Joshua Santos)

Comments (3)

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I do not support the changes to the code of conduct. There will always be another person or group of people demanding more changes and soon the code of conduct will not look any different than a non- Catholic school. God loves all of his...

I do not support the changes to the code of conduct. There will always be another person or group of people demanding more changes and soon the code of conduct will not look any different than a non- Catholic school. God loves all of his creation and we should therefore show respect to all of creation - period.
But we were made in His image - male and female and marriage is between a man and a woman because it’s purpose is procreation.
To make theses changes to the code of conduct denies these laws of God and essentially teaches the opposite. We must teach what is in the Bible or we will be held accountable on judgement day. Catholic schools should arrange their funding so they are independent of the government.

Read More
Joanee
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

To the members of the TSSBD,

Cardinal Collins has told us, as Catholics, we must stand up for our convictions.

I do not believe that I could hold your members up as following his comment.

Either you do not truly know the Church's teachings or...

To the members of the TSSBD,

Cardinal Collins has told us, as Catholics, we must stand up for our convictions.

I do not believe that I could hold your members up as following his comment.

Either you do not truly know the Church's teachings or you have chosen to ignore them.

We cannot expect our students to learn and grow in their Faith when the adults are afraid to Stand UP for What the Church Teaches. This decision appalls me and,as a retired teacher, I would have certainly objected strongly to teach something against the Church's Teachings, How can the Church once again flourish if Catholics do not STAND UP FOR THEIR CONVICTIONS? Therefore what are your convictions in this matter!!!!???
May God be with you and the Holy Spirit be a very STRONG influence in your living your Faith.
Sincerely
Janet McCarron
Wallaceburg, On.

Read More
Janet
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I disagree with your changes to the code of conduct for the following reasons:

1. The goal of this change is not about making the LGBTQ2+ community feel included or more safe. It is solely about the goal of imposing the LGBTQ2+ values on all of...

I disagree with your changes to the code of conduct for the following reasons:

1. The goal of this change is not about making the LGBTQ2+ community feel included or more safe. It is solely about the goal of imposing the LGBTQ2+ values on all of society and slowly eroding our Christian value system and the family unit.

2. The Toronto School Board does not speak for the Catholic Church and does not make the rules for the Catholic Church - so they do not have the authority to make these changes.

3. The individuals on the Toronto School Board do not occupy these places because of their knowledge and understanding of the Catholic faith. They have made changes that violate the Catholic faith because they do not know what the Bible teaches - or they think their personal opinions and values trump those of the Bible.The Catholic faith is not a buffet where you can pick what you like best.

4. Allowing the LGTQB2+ beliefs (or any other non-Catholic beliefs) to be imposed on the Code of Conduct is a violation of our freedom to come together to freely practice our religion.

5. God loves all of his creation - period. We are made in God's image - both male and female. Marriage has been made for procreation - and so for a man and a woman. Just because God's plan is not always easy to follow, does not mean we change God's plan to suit what we want.

With regards,
Joan Davies

Read More
Joanee
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Support The Catholic Register

Unlike many other news websites, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our site. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.