Pope Pius XII, head of the Church from 1939-58, gives a blessing at the end of a radio message Sept. 1, 1943. CNS photo

Don’t judge Pius XII yet, expert warns

By 
  • May 8, 2020

One document uncovered during one week of research isn’t enough to draw new or final conclusions about Pope Pius XII’s guilt or innocence regarding the Holocaust, warns Canada’s leading expert on the wartime pope.

“There’s certainly no discovery here. It’s not news that the Vatican was receiving reports (of Nazi atrocities). That’s abundantly clear,” King’s University College historian Robert Ventresca told The Catholic Register.

The world of Holocaust research was rocked late in April when Fr. Wolf Hubert, a church historian and expert consultant on the possible canonization of Pius XII, revealed to a German newspaper that his team of seven researchers discovered a memo that cast Pius in a potentially unfavourable light. Written by a staffer at the Vatican’s Secretariat of State, it warned Pius against believing reports of German atrocities he’d received from Jewish sources and from the Ukrainian Catholic Patriarch Cardinal Andrey Sheptytsky.

The Vatican official, then Fr. and later Cardinal Angelo Dell’Acqua, said that Jews “easily exaggerate” and that “Orientals” (Ukrainian Catholics) “are really not an example of honesty.”

“This doesn’t paint that individual (Dell’Acqua) in a flattering light. But I mean, what does it tell us?” Ventresca asked. “That there was prejudice and bigotry in those circles? Well, we knew that.”

Still, the Dell’Acqua memo may be an important finding, said Ventresca. In 1942 American officials had asked the Vatican whether it could confirm reports the U.S. had received from the Jewish Agency in Geneva that the Nazis had murdered hundreds of thousands in Lviv, Ukraine, and the Warsaw Ghetto. The Vatican had reports from its own sources, including the letter from Sheptytsky, but chose not to share the information or confirm the massacres.

“The issue for us always is, why did they make the decisions that they made? What’s the motive behind the caution?” Ventresca said.

Ventresca is the author of the award-winning 2013 book, Soldier of Christ: The Life of Pope Pius XII. He’s currently working on The Vatican and the Holocaust for Cambridge University Press.

While the Dell’Acqua memo might be a clue, it’s not proof of any Pius misdeed without the broader context of the entire archive, he said. The problem is that Hubert’s team and all the other researchers had to leave when COVID-19 shut down the Apostolic Archive just one week after the Pius XII documents became available.

Ventresca wrote about Pius XII’s reluctance to share information about the Holocaust in his 2013 book.

“I said to my wife this morning, this is frustrating because it shows that people don’t always read very closely what you wrote,” he said.

Scholars have known for a long time that Pope Pius XII knew about a pattern of massive atrocities being committed against Jews by the Nazi government in the context of the war. They also knew that Pius chose to say nothing publicly against it. The debate has been about whether Pius believed speaking out would only accelerate the Nazi death campaign, whether he saw it as a non-issue for the Church or whether he in some way agreed with Nazi ideology.

The question of motive remains unanswered, Ventresca said. Real research into such complex history never comes down to single documents and “gotcha” moments, he said.

“Those kinds of documents that Wolf Hubert is finding, that’s what we’re looking for. That’s the context; that’s the nuance. That’s going to help us get a deeper understanding of things,” he said.

“I’m just cautioning people against rushing to judgment without taking the time to go from evidence to conclusions and judgment. That takes time.”

Ventresca was scheduled to visit the archive in June. With the toll that COVID-19 has taken in Italy and the long line of historians and researchers who got bumped when the archive closed, he’s not expecting to get in before fall.

“What we’re seeing is the start of a new wave of research that I know will, in time, bring us to a deeper understanding,” he said.

Ventresca is not alone in cautioning against quick and easy conclusions. Polish historian Jan Zaryn has also cast doubt on whether or not the Dell’Acqua memo is conclusive.

“I’ve never personally encountered a situation in which 11 volumes of material, published over two decades, are suddenly countermanded by a single document, found after a few days’ research,” Zaryn told a Catholic News Service correspondent.

The 11 volumes referred to by Zaryn are a collection of wartime documents assembled by Jesuit scholars over two decades in response to Pope Paul VI’s call for an open accounting of the Vatican’s actions during the Holocaust. By the mid-1960s Pius XII was already being called “Hitler’s Pope.”

The Pius XII section of the Apostolic Archives (formerly known as the Secret Archives) contains at least 200,000 boxes with over two million documents.

Comments (1)

This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

It should be noted that it is a too hard of a conclusion to say that Pius XII "knew" about the holocaust. We know he received reports about it, but that is not equivalent to knowing about it. Many world leaders and even citizens in Italy and...

It should be noted that it is a too hard of a conclusion to say that Pius XII "knew" about the holocaust. We know he received reports about it, but that is not equivalent to knowing about it. Many world leaders and even citizens in Italy and Germany heard things about the holocaust but didn't know whether to believe them. Who could blame them? It was just utterly unbelievable that something so horrible would be happening. And when you are not sure about the veracity of reports, especially ones that make such unprecedented claims, it would be imprudent to go publicly denouncing things especially in the face of such a hostile and deadly opponent.

Nobody at the time really believed the holocaust was happening until they saw it, until U.S. soldiers uncovered the camps. Pius XII never saw it. He only had unsubstantiated reports, like everyone else. So why blame Pius XII for behaving any differently. This is just another example of people looking for an excuse to point fingers at the Church. Sloppy scholarship.

Read More
Joseph
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible, which has become acutely important amid the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.