Abortion controversy is about getting the vote

By  Brian Lilley, Catholic Register Special
  • April 1, 2010

{mosimage}It is a settled issue. At least, that is what politicians and opinion leaders have been saying about abortion for the past 20 years in Ottawa.

So why then did the issue of abortion result in not only a heated debate in Parliament March 23 but also cause the leaders of the two main political parties to face a caucus revolt? I would argue it is because the issue is not settled at all.

According to a Harris-Decima poll for the Manning Centre 74 per cent of Canadians find abortion morally wrong (60 per cent strongly agreeing, 14 per cent somewhat agreeing). When politicians say the issue is settled, it is to avoid discussion of what abortion really is and explanations of why they support or oppose Canada’s current status quo of zero limit on abortion right up to the moment of birth.

Since Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced his plan for lowering mortality rates for mothers and children in the developing world there has been fierce lobbying from the pro-life and pro-choice sides on whether a “full range” of family planning options, including abortion, should be included. While the Conservative government received heat from pro-life activists to keep it out, Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff answered calls from Action Canada and the International Planned Parenthood Federation to put it in. The issue came to a head with a vote, and public humiliation for Ignatieff, in the House of Commons.

A motion tabled by Toronto-Centre Liberal MP Bob Rae never explicitly used the word abortion but it did use language that made it clear abortion is what the motion was all about. Several Liberals were unhappy.

One pro-life Liberal MP told me he contacted Ignatieff’s office to discuss the issue but did not hear back. Several did hear from voters, though, and that, says Paul Szabo from Mississauga, is why he voted against his leader and party and with the government to defeat the motion.

Two other Liberals from the Toronto area voted against the motion, Dan McTeague of Pickering and John McKay of Scarborough; 14 other Liberals abstained or did not show up, enough to see the motion defeated 144-138.

Yet, if a pre-vote emergency meeting of the Conservative Party had turned out differently, those three Liberals may have ended up as the only MPs voting against the motion. The day before the vote, rumours began circulating around Parliament Hill that the government would whip the vote in favour of the opposition motion. All Conservatives present in the House — pro-life MPs would have permission to stay away — would be forced to vote for it.  Several sources said the prime minister’s chief of staff, Guy Giorno, was behind this strategy. The prime minister’s office  argued that since the motion did not explicitly mention abortion, it was okay to vote in favour. Pro-life MPs argued differently.

At an emergency caucus meeting before the vote, pro-life Conservatives convinced their pro-choice colleagues that the party should not back a motion that contradicted Harper’s public pledge to exclude abortion in his maternal health care plan. In the end, Harper changed his mind, reportedly quoting 19th-century French politician Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin: “There go my people. I must find out where they’re going so I can lead them.”

Ignatieff says he and his party will continue to fight to have any plan to save the lives of mothers and children in the developing world include abortion.

Such a move seems destined to only further the trend of the Liberals losing their once-solid hold of votes from Mass-attending Catholics, 49 per cent of whom now vote Conservative according to Angus Reid polling.

Harper continues to walk the line of avoiding taking a stand —  trying not to be regarded as overtly pro-life but doing just enough so that pro-life voters will support his party. It’s a game that could backfire, and surely would have if his emergency caucus meeting had gone another way.

Amid the fracas over what shape Canada’s maternal health care strategy will take, it is important to remember that the actions and positions of the Liberals and Conservatives are driven as much by domestic political considerations as anything else. The Liberals believe that appealing to women necessitates being pro-abortion. The Conservatives, meanwhile, hope to attract religious-minded voters, viewed as pro-life, without giving them anything the Liberals could construe as a right-wing “hidden agenda” to take away “abortion rights.”

So expect to see this so-called “settled” issue of maternal care play a large role in the next election as the priority of both sides is less about helping women in the developing world as gaining your vote.

(Brian Lilley is the Ottawa Bureau Chief for Newstalk 1010 Toronto and CJAD 800 Montreal.)

Please support The Catholic Register

Unlike many media companies, The Catholic Register has never charged readers for access to the news and information on our website. We want to keep our award-winning journalism as widely available as possible. But we need your help.

For more than 125 years, The Register has been a trusted source of faith-based journalism. By making even a small donation you help ensure our future as an important voice in the Catholic Church. If you support the mission of Catholic journalism, please donate today. Thank you.

DONATE