FREE access to the digital edition and archives until September 2. Click here.

The Catholic Register

Browse2010 › September

September 2010


September 27


September 29


An Unholy Trinity: Money, Sex and Death

September 29, 2010

It’s always a toss-up as to what makes the most headlines and grabs the most attention and a bit confusing when fundamental issues go missing in the mix. The Vatican Bank (Institute For Works of Religion as it is more formally known) story caught everyone by surprise when it broke late last week. Most major media outlets couldn’t resist the temptation to somehow link the freezing of Vatican accounts with the Clerical Sex abuse scandal. But while the cheap shot is simple the actual story about what is or isn’t going on at the bank is truly confusing. The Financial Times tried to put it all in some context but ends up with more speculation and some potted history. Granted the Bank has always confused people, even its Wikipedia entry is “disputed”, and proven the source and inspiration of a great deal of conspiracy thinking and novelistic thriller writing. What seems clear from veteran Vatican Watchers in the United States like David Gibson or John Allen is that all the evidence seems to suggest that the Bank, under the new leadership of Ettore Tedeschi is actually shaping up into a modern financial institution while avoiding some of the major mistakes so-called modern institutions have been guilty of over the past couple of years. Pope Benedict XVI has gone on record supporting Tedeschi’s work, which only stands to reason given Tedeschi’s status as a moral thinker and the author of a well-regarded commentary on Benedict’s Encyclical Caritas in Veritate. Ettore Tedeschi, and others, see much of the controversy as originating in other agendas, ones hostile to the Vatican generally. The bolt out of the blue from the Ontario Superior Court striking down Canada’s prostitution laws has everyone shaking their heads. The Government announced an appeal but some thoughtful critics are calling for something more. This is an issue the Church has been out front of for some time now, with its persistent calls for a strategic effort to putting an end to Human Trafficking. It is ironic that while the media can obsess on what is seen in secular circles as the Church’s out-dated attitudes towards sex. But on an issue like human trafficking, which is at the heart of a great deal of prostitution, the Church’s leadership is ignored. Margaret Somerville’s observations in the Catholic Register on the ‘targeting’ of Quebec as the next front in the Euthanasia movement is only unusual given the relatively little sustained coverage the story is receiving anywhere. When the current round of public hearings inquiring into changing the laws on assisted suicide and euthanasia began there was a flurry of attention but moral issues often slide by the wayside as ‘more pressing’ matters such as the machinations of Parliament or MacLean’s magazine’ cover story on corruption in Quebec push aside what maybe the fundamental issue of our time. Somerville isn't the only voice being raised on the issue, but she is one of the more consistent.


September 30


Religion vs. agnostic know-nothings

September 30, 2010

Not long ago I was invited, along with half a dozen other men, to debate the proposition: “Resolved: That agnosticism is the only honest religious position.” It was an old-fashioned evening — shades of the 1860 debate between Bishop Wilberforce and Thomas Huxley when Huxley said he would rather be descended from an ape than from a bishop (alas, an often sympathetic position) — but it was enjoyable all the same. Afterwards, one participant remarked: “I didn’t know people met to discuss serious questions.” Each participant got five minutes to state his position without interruption. When all had finished, everyone could intervene freely to probe or comment upon what others had said. Then followed a free-for-all discussion. The format worked well. After precisely two hours, we shut off debate, had a cup of tea, and departed into the night. I contended that the proposition that agnosticism is the only honest religious position, while useful to provoke discussion, suffered three basic flaws: it is an oxymoron; it is contrary to human experience and therefore likely to be false; and it is a placebo for the spiritually timid. The Oxford English Dictionary defines agnosticism as the belief that nothing beyond material phenomena can possibly be known. Given that definition, the proposition is an oxymoron. It refutes itself. If nothing about religion can reliably be known, then it cannot be known whether anything about religion can reliably be known. If it is impossible to decide the truth or falsity of religious claims, then it is impossible to decide whether agnosticism is a preferable religious claim to even the narrowest or most fanatical religious prejudice.