FREE access to the digital edition and archives until September 2. Click here.

The Catholic Register

Browse2010 › December

December 2010


December 12


Wikileaks Comes to the Vatican

December 12, 2010

Given the size of the cache of documents that Wikileaks promised to release on the world, it was inevitable that The Vatican’s day would come and come it has. Needless to say, the copies of cables between Embassy and Home Country touch on just about every possible issue confounding the Church: reaction on the part of the curia to the Irish Sex Scandal gets serious mention; Benedict’s, or rather Cardinal Ratzinger’s, concerns about the possibility of Turkey joining the European Union; the continuing hints of anti-Semitism within Church ranks; the enticement of Anglicans to join Rome, climate change, even the style and content of the Church’s communications strategy was the subject of some cables. John Allen jr. in the National Catholic Reporter elaborates on the full extent of the issues mentioned in the cables. Edward Pentin of the National Catholic Register notes that not much of what is released in and of itself is a surprise. Paul Moses of Commonweal Magazine shares Pentin’s sense that the cables are not too surprising but delves further into the issue of the Vatican’s communication style, or lack thereof. The Vatican acknowledged the publication of the cables with simple; some might say elegant, minimalism all the while advising people to treat the cables with prudence. And of course the Pope and the Church are not alone in trying to work out exactly how to respond to this unprecedented exercise in ‘whistle blowing”. Michael Cook at Mercator tries to work through some of the twists and turns that Wikileaks is causing for everyone, concluding ultimately that the impact is pernicious, though if you scroll down the comments section it becomes clear that his opinion is not universally shared. Margaret Somerville of McGill tries a similar ethical examination and admits she “finds herself agreeing with Hilary Clinton”.


December 16


Nuclear Weapons and the Battle over Christmas

December 16, 2010

You know how NORAD every year does the fake alert about incoming flying objects that instead of bombers and missiles from Russia turn out to be a sleigh and 8 reindeer and we all chuckle? Well Christmas and Nuclear Weapons are linking up in a slightly more serious vein this year. We may all think that the threat of Nuclear War is a dim nightmare from the 1980s and that our biggest concerns are rogue states such as North Korea and Iran but the reality is that the world is filled with weapons of mass destruction despite President Barack Obama’s declaration that he wants to see a world without the bomb. Earlier this year on the 65th Anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Pope said the “experience in Japan should remind the world of the need to find political solutions to international problems, and of the need to halt the spread of nuclear weapons.” All of the moral and strategic arguments about Nuclear War have landed in the United States Senate this week as debate over the START treaty got underway. The U.S. Bishops and most of America’s leading Evangelical clerics have long been onside with the idea of getting the START Treaty in place. Bishop Howard J. Hubbard of the USCCB put the Catholic case starkly “Nuclear war is rejected in Church teaching because nuclear weapons cannot insure non-combatant immunity and their awesome destructive power and lingering radiation cannot be meaningfully proportionate” and Leith Anderson, President of the National Association of Evangelicals was equally blunt “In the long and tragic history of human warfare the nuclear weapon occupies a singular position due to the scope and scale of its terrible and indiscriminate power to destroy human life. Evangelicals strongly believe in the sanctity of life.” Opponents of the new START treaty engaged in what might be the ultimate in chutzpah when they objected to making the Senate work during the Christmas Break alleging that to do so was to violate the true meaning of Christmas. Religious Leaders were not amused. Stephen Schneck, Director of the Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies at the Catholic University of America lashed out at the Senators saying “Working men and women are at their jobs in this holy season---before Christmas, after Christmas, and for some even on Christmas Day. I'm convinced the Christ Child specially blesses those first responders, military personnel, health care providers, and other emergency workers who spend His birthday in service to others. Senators, truly honor Christians. Stay at your desks until this work to which you have been called is resolved”. By Thursday debate was underway, it remains to be seen whether the Bishops and the National Association of Evangelicals will get their Christmas present.


December 17


December 22